After the AI workshop
This isn't a list of AI prompts. It's the concrete tools, Skills and habits that make what you learned in the workshop actually stick — week after week, not just the day we were there.
Why this document exists
Most "AI workshops" end with an idea list nobody acts on. This page is meant to be read after the workshop, by you, and actually implemented in your day-to-day work. Everything below is something we actively use ourselves, not theory.
The main exercise in the workshop was that every participant should leave with at least one own Skill: a reusable recipe that makes the AI solve a recurring task exactly the way you want it solved, every time, without re-explaining yourself.
Technically, a Skill is just a folder with one file, SKILL.md, plus optional helper files (scripts, templates, reference documents). The file has two parts: a short YAML header the AI uses to know when the skill is relevant, and an instructions section explaining how the task should be solved. The format was created by Anthropic and is now an open standard supported by Claude Code, Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and several other AI tools.
Notice the structure: the skill does not say "be a good engineer". It locks in a concrete, repeatable working pattern you already know works. That's the difference between a Skill and a regular prompt: a prompt is forgotten when the conversation closes, a Skill sits ready the next time someone needs the same task solved.
Don't start broad. Take one concrete, recurring task from the workshop's workflow mapping, something you can describe in three sentences.
What does the sharpest person on the team do differently from everyone else when solving exactly this task? That's what goes into the skill.
You don't need to write the YAML format yourself. Describe the task in plain language and ask Claude to structure it as a Skill (Anthropic's official skill-creator does exactly this).
Run the skill on an actual case from last week. Check whether the result is something you'd genuinely send onward without editing.
A Skill that only sits with one person saves one person time. Shared across the team, the same quality level becomes the standard for everyone, not just the sharpest person.
Before building a skill from scratch: check whether someone has already made a good one. There are large, curated collections of ready-made Skills (including Anthropic's own anthropics/skills collection and community collections like ComposioHQ's awesome-claude-skills). Reusing a proven skill is almost always faster than polishing your own from scratch — see point 4 for how to check it's actually safe first.
Skills solve individual tasks. But you also want the AI to remember things that apply across everything: how you write, which systems you use, what's forbidden without approval. That's the job of a CLAUDE.md file: a simple text file the AI always reads first, in every project or every conversation.
Five rules that actually make a difference, drawn from Anthropic's own recommendations and established community practice:
<!-- like this --> gets stripped automatically before the AI sees it, so it's safe for internal explanations without spending the AI's context.Most modern AI tools now have some form of memory: information carried between conversations without anyone pasting it in again each time. Used well, it saves enormous amounts of time. Used badly, it fills the context with stale information the AI never checks is still true.
A long, technical conversation over time fills up the context window, and quality degrades gradually without it being obvious. A simple trick: add a standing instruction that the AI should always start every reply with a specific phrase, for example "here's my answer, [your name]".
As long as the phrase (and the name) comes through correctly every time, the AI is still actively following instructions. If it starts forgetting the phrase, forgetting the name, or suddenly replies in a different language than the conversation, that's a reliable signal it's lost sharpness, and you should start a new session instead of pushing on in the same one.
A Skill is, in practice, code and instructions someone else wrote, given permission to steer how the AI behaves. That makes it useful, and it makes it a real attack surface if you download one from an unknown source. Independent reviews have found malicious content in a non-trivial share of publicly shared skills, ranging from data theft to backdoors.
Use a Skill security tool before installing anything from outside your team, for example NVIDIA SkillSpector or a similar community skill-scanning tool. They check for hidden data collection, prompt injection and other suspicious patterns, and give you a concrete assessment before the skill gets access to anything.
1) You're wondering whether a skill you found is safe to use. 2) You're considering building something yourself, but want to first know whether an established, vetted skill already does the job, so you don't reinvent the wheel.
These are the most frequent tasks we see engineers and technical teams actually use AI for, with the tool or type of Skill we'd recommend for each. Some are official Anthropic skills, some are well-established community skills, some are tools you probably already have access to, and some you should build yourself in the workshop.
| Task | Recommended tool | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Finding information scattered across Confluence/Jira | Atlassian Rovo (built-in AI search) | Existing tool |
| Stress-testing a technical decision before you commit | "grill-me" skill (asks critical questions until you have a shared picture) | Community, established |
| Writing meeting notes from a transcript or bullet points | A custom skill with a fixed template per meeting type | Build in the workshop |
| Code review before merging | Built-in code-review skill | Official |
| Systematic debugging of a bug or deviation | Systematic-debugging skill | Official |
| Security review of code or changes | Security-review skill | Official |
| Structuring a technical plan before you build | Writing-plans / brainstorming skill | Official |
| Creating or editing Word documents (contracts, reports) | Anthropic's docx skill | Official |
| Creating or cleaning up Excel sheets | Anthropic's xlsx skill | Official |
| Creating presentations | Anthropic's pptx skill | Official |
| Reading and analysing PDFs (specs, contracts) | Anthropic's pdf skill | Official |
| Building your own reusable AI recipes | Anthropic's skill-creator | Official |
| Checking whether a skill is safe before installing | NVIDIA SkillSpector / skill-security-scan | Existing tool |
| Visualising data as charts or dashboards | Dataviz skill | Official |
| Drawing architecture or process diagrams | Artifact-diagramming skill | Official |
| Having a finished report waiting each morning | Claude Cowork on a fixed schedule | Existing tool |
| Working on several parallel technical threads without mixing them up | Using-git-worktrees skill | Official |
| Getting a critical second opinion on your own work before delivery | Requesting/receiving-code-review skill | Official |
| Keeping the AI consistent across sessions and projects | CLAUDE.md + memory architecture (see points 2–3) | Own practice |
| Cleaning up a memory that's become messy over time | Anthropic's consolidate-memory skill | Official |
"Official" means a skill published by Anthropic itself. "Community, established" means an openly shared skill with significant use and a good track record — but review it yourself with a security tool (point 4) before adopting it. "Existing tool" is not a Claude Skill, but something you probably already have access to.
You've now identified a concrete opportunity in the workshop, and the tools above to actually do something about it. Two ways forward: